Religion & Politics – How do you view it?
Religion and politics are two of the most important aspects of life that touch everyone no matter what class or accomplishments they may have managed to attain in their lives.
This subject shouldn't be taken lightly and must be looked upon through the eyes of your fellow man so that you may walk in his shoes, if only for a few brief strides that translate into but weeks, so you and I will know and understand those that affect our lives in an ongoing and yet surreptitious fashion.
Evolutionists, Darwinists, and others of a similar notion have yet to see what is so clearly in front of them. They cannot understand that no matter how hard we humans have searched the seemingly infinite universe we cannot find any planet like our own that sustains not just life but complex living beings and plant life of all types.
Those who do not believe in God must surely look to the Sun and ask how it got there and who tells it when and where to rise in the morning. They must ask themselves how oceans stop along our coasts and do not come forth and drown each of us unto our own destiny.
It is easy to say that we came from single celled organisms that somehow and inexplicably came to be from some massive bang that itself is unexplained. It is the exact reason why the word FAITH exists in ALL vocabularies throughout the world because it is much harder to not only have such a thing but to truly live it.
The hard part comes down to understanding the difference between why one would choose to be Jewish, Muslim, Shinto, or any other form of religion that believes there are one or more gods in existence and determine which tale of old is in the right and is the true explanation to who we are and where we come from.
I cannot answer this question for you or even for myself and I doubt that when we walk away from this class we will have the answer. But what I can tell you is that there is a moment in your life when you will come to meet that end where all questions will be answered for you and I. It will be at that moment, when we take our last breath, that we will know if we have chosen the right tale to believe in and whether or not we lived our lives in a way that our Maker will be proud of.
Print This Post
Why Hire A Woman?
I just finished reading an article by Vogue Editor Alexandria Shulman entitled Year-long maternity leave, flex hours, four-day weeks... why would ANY boss hire a woman? You can read it for yourself here (highly recommended).
In the United States, if you have 15 or more employees you are subject to federal law that protects pregnant women. That law, Pregnancy Discrimination Act which is part of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, provides women who are pregnant with protections that ensure they are treated the same as other applicants and employees on the basis of their ability or inability to work.
In other words, you cannot fire, refuse a job, or deny a promotion merely because they are pregnant. In addition, a woman usually may not be forced to go on leave as long as she is able to work.
Here is an interesting tidbit that I bet many of you didn't know: Iowa is one of a only a few states that require employers who have LESS than 15 employees to abide by Federal and Iowa specific laws as follows.
Iowa's pregnancy leave law applies to employers with four employees or more, and requires that written and unwritten employment policies and practices involving matters such as the commencement and duration of leave, the availability of extensions, the accrual of seniority and other benefits and privileges, reinstatement, and payment under any health or temporary disability insurance or sick leave plan, formal or informal, must be applied to a disability due to the employee's pregnancy or giving birth on the same terms and conditions as they are applied to other temporary disabilities. In any event, the employee must be permitted up to eight weeks of leave for pregnancy-related disability, as needed.
I love children, and having two of my own, know the difficulties that can be presented in day-to-day activities and life in general. However, I am NOT a fan of such laws and whole-heartedly agree with the comments made by Shulman in her article. However, we vary in one important aspect and that is the fact that I don't believe in these laws AT ALL.
You see, the law treats being pregnant as a disability and as such affords you a fairly lengthy amount of time off WITH PAY that the employer has to cover. The difference, at least in the way I see it, is that pregnancy is NOT a disability but a CHOICE that a husband and wife make together and in doing so should plan for the event. I think that the first year of a baby's life is probably one of the most important because they are so delicate and need their parents there to help them develop properly.
I don't think it is out of the question to assume that most working families cannot afford to save enough money to cover their expenses for that first year so that a Mom could take the entire year of from her job or more if she so desired. However, upon returning to the workplace I don't think she should be treated ANY differently than anyone else who left the workforce and then decided to come back a year later (school, family issues, or whatever reason someone would leave the workforce).
Leave with pay should be an option provided to employees by the employer and not forced upon them by government intervention. This is where personal responsibility comes into play. It is a choice to have a child and not a right to get paid for it.
What do you think; agree or disagree?
Print This Post
Vote Clears Way for Illinois Abortion Notification Law
The AP released a news article stating that the State of Illinois Medical Disciplinary Board has decided not to extend a 90-day grace period put into place in August.
Illinois' law had been passed in 1995 that forced abortionist doctors to provide parents with a 48 hour notice of girls 17 and younger who intended to get abortions. That law, however, was never enforced because of constant court actions to prevent it. Organizations such as The American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois intends to ask for a new temporary restraining order to keep the state from enforcing the law.
This is where things start to get a little interesting. You see, as a Libertarian I believe that individual right to privacy is an important natural right and should be observed at all times. However, we are dealing with the murder of an innocent baby for no other reason than the immature and irresponsible nature of a teenager who made a foolish choice.
I think that is why I call myself a Conservative Libertarian because Morals must come into play at some point and we aren't the Wild Wild West and so no baby should suffer such a fate. How about this, lets encourage these teenagers to have the children and put them up for adoption and possible force child support on them to help pay for the baby until it has been adopted by another family. That way our taxes are mitigated and the teenager(s) learn a continious lesson on what they have done.
Now, some of you out there might say something along the lines of, "...if we start charging teenagers money for babies they won't want they will force the abortion upon themselves without the aid of medical professionals, wont they?". I can see that as a legitimate concern for some of you out there but you are forgetting that I'm treating the forced and intentional abortion of a child as MURDER. The punishment for finding out that a teenager forced the abortion would be tried as such in a court of law and so it would highly encourage teens not to perform such an act.
I'd love to hear what all of you have to say about this. Don't be shy, no matter what side of the fence you are on let your comments rip. But I remind you, please use fact-based evidence to backup any statement you might make.
Print This Post
Senator Grassley – Fighting The Good Fight
Fellow patriots, I ask you today to review this statement released by our Senator Chuck Grassley in regards to the America's Healthy Future Act. He really fought for us on this one and we owe him a bill of thanks. His contact information can be found at the end.
Sen. Grassley delivered part of this statement, then submitted the rest into the committee record.
Markup of the America’s Healthy Future Act
Senate Finance Committee
Statement by Senator Chuck Grassley, Ranking Member
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Mr. Chairman, first of all, I want to commend you for bringing this markup to where it is today. It seems like a long time since we started on September 22nd. We’ve been able to air our differences and have the votes. I wish I felt better about the substance of the bill.
The chairman’s mark has undergone many changes during this process and they are not to the good. I’ll highlight a few of the changes I find most disturbing. As I highlight these issues, it will be clear that this bill is already sliding rapidly down the slippery slope to more and more government control of health care.
It has the biggest expansion of Medicaid since it was created in 1965.
It imposes an unprecedented federal mandate for coverage backed by the enforcement authority of the Internal Revenue Service.
It increases the size of the government by at least $1.8 trillion when fully implemented.
It gives the secretary of Health and Human Services the power to define benefits for every private plan in America and to redefine those benefits annually. That’s a lot of power over people’s lives.
It will cause health care premiums for millions to go up, not down.
It tightens further the new federal rating bands for insurance rates. That means that millions who are expecting lower costs as a result of health reform will end up paying more in the form of higher premiums. The new rating reforms alone will raise premiums by as much as 50 percent on millions.
It imposes new fees and taxes. These new fees and taxes will total about a half trillion dollars over the next few years. On the front end, these fees and taxes will cause premium increases as early as 2010 even before most of the reforms take effect.
Then after forcing health premiums to go up, this bill makes it mandatory to buy it.
On several occasions, Republicans tried to take the chairman’s mark in a different direction. We tried to ensure that the President’s pledge to not tax middle-income families, seniors, or veterans was carried out. We were rebuffed every step of the way.
And Republican efforts to provide consumers with a lower cost benefit option were consistently defeated – this means that despite the promises, a lot of people aren’t actually going to be able to “keep what they have.”
It imposes higher premiums for prescription drug coverage on seniors and the disabled.
And it creates a new Medicare commission with broad authority to make further cuts in Medicare and it makes that commission permanent.
In our group of six negotiations, I resisted making the commission permanent. And I certainly wasn't going to agree to target prescription drug premiums.
But this bill now requires the Medicare commission to continue making cuts to Medicare forever. The damage this group of unelected people could do to Medicare is unknown.
What's more alarming is that so many providers got exempted from the cuts this commission would make that it forces the cuts to fall directly on seniors and the disabled.
The Congressional Budget Office has confirmed that the commission structure requires it to focus its budget axe on the premiums seniors pay for Part D prescription drug coverage and for Medicare Advantage.
Sooner or later, it has to be acknowledged that, by making the commission permanent, those savings are coming from more and more cuts to Medicare.
Finally, I can’t help but note the incredible cynicism in an amendment that took benefits away from children. That amendment was offered and passed because the chairman’s mark had the audacity to let children get covered through private insurance.
In 41 states, children would have received access to the EPSDT benefit.
EPSDT benefits cover vitally needed services for children such as rehabilitation services, physical, occupational and speech therapy particularly for children with developmental disabilities.
But those benefits were deleted by Rockefeller Amendment C21. Now children in 41 states won’t have access to health care and they’ll be left in a grossly underfunded public program. And they lost these important benefits.
What this mark up has shown is that there is a clear and significant philosophical difference between the two sides.
Throughout the markup, we have focused on trying to reduce the overall cost of the bill. We were told ‘no’.
We focused on trying to reduce the pervasive role of government in the chairman’s mark. We were told ‘no’.
We tried to make it harder to for illegal immigrants to get benefits. We were told ‘no’.
We tried to guarantee that federal funding for abortions wouldn’t be allowed under this bill. We were told ‘no’.
We tried to allow alternatives to the individual mandate and harsh penalties. We were told 'no'.
We tried to reward states with extra Medicaid dollars if they passed medical malpractice reform. We were told not just ‘no’ but shockingly we were told Medicaid isn’t even in the committee’s jurisdiction.
We have watched while the other side has expanded public coverage.
We saw Democrat amendments move millions from private coverage into public coverage.
We saw Democrat amendments create new government programs that cover families making close to 90 thousand dollars.
And at the end of the day, after raising billions in new taxes, cutting hundreds of billions from Medicare, and imposing stiff new penalties for people who don’t buy insurance, and increasing costs for those that do … 25 million people will still not even have health insurance.
I don’t think this is what the American people had in mind when we promised to fix the health care system.
As I said when this process started, the chairman’s mark that was released 27 days ago was an incomplete, but comprehensive, good faith attempt to reach a bipartisan agreement.
But then the modification pulled that attempt at bipartisan compromise very far toward a partisan approach on several key issues.
With this markup nearing its conclusion we can now see clearly that the bill continues its march leftward.
The broad bipartisan character of the reform proposal has changed.
This partisan change is precisely what Republicans feared would occur at later stages in the legislative process.
Today we see that those fears were legitimate and justified.
Nevertheless, I still hold out hope that at some point the doorway to bipartisanship will be opened once again.
I hope that at some point the White House and leadership will want to correct the mistake they made by ending our collaborative bipartisan work.
I hope at some point they will want to let that bipartisan work begin again. And then, they need to back that effort and give it the time needed to get it right.
But it is clear that today is not the day when that is going to happen.
Again, please send a quick note to Sen. Grassley thanking him for his hard work on this issue! As promised, here is his contact information:
Iowa Sen Chuck Grassley (R) - (202) 224-6020
http://grassley.senate.gov/contact.cfm#emailform
Print This Post
The American Tradition – Halloween
I must admit that I do love Halloween. Although my church (First Assembly of God) does not believe that we should celebrate or participate in such activities (at least according to my pastor) I cannot subscribe to such. I, and my family, are independent Christians and do not subscribe to any real specific church and/or all of their customs. We know that me must obey the 10 commandments, believe that Jesus Christ is our true savior, and that God Almighty was, is, and always will be and those truths are enough for us to be with God for eternity.
I found an article on the First Assembly of God website that speaks specifically to this holiday and I thought I would post it here for those interested in learning what their thoughts are on the subject. You can find the article in its entirety here.
Halloween causes a greatly magnified problem for Assemblies of God members and adherents. Many of the holiday’s nonreligious symbols and practices are not just neutral, they seem pagan or anti-Christian. On the other hand, certain symbols and activities appear to be neutral, such as pumpkin jack-o’-lanterns, grade school parties, bobbing for apples, and neighborhood "trick or treat," with no tricks whatsoever.
Many symbols and activities, however, hold potential problems for Christian families. Focusing on witches, ghosts of departed persons, evil monsters, devils, and other characters associated with the satanic should never be allowed in Christian social activities, even in innocent play. Young children and even adolescents may, through a light treatment of evil, lose some of their sensitivity to the realities of right and wrong.
Christian parents face a major problem when their young children get caught up in the excitement that friends and playmates express about Halloween parties and wearing bright costumes for a "trick or treat" visit to the homes of trusted neighbors and friends. Circumstances may vary and require different decisions by parents according to the local situation. One or two generations ago, Halloween pranks like soaping windows and overturning sheds seldom turned to breaking windows and destroying property. But in many communities, behavior has changed drastically for the worse. What parents as children once felt to be innocent fun may be something more sinister in today’s society.
There is good reason for exercising extreme caution, even when a parent may feel there is no immediate danger. Involvement in the occult usually begins with something seemingly very innocent and non-threatening. Some game pieces, like the Ouija board, can begin as child’s play but end up as flirtation with demonic powers. A curious reading of horoscopes can move into curiosity about one’s future in a way contrary to Scripture. We are to consult with no one except God about the future, yielding to His silence if He chooses not to answer. A dabbler in the mysterious and unknown can become easy prey to invasion by Satan. Inasmuch as any of these elements are a part of Halloween, the Christian must flee unwholesome curiosity, making God and His Word the source of answers about the spirit world.
Paul’s admonition to the Corinthian Christians about eating meat that had been offered to idols (1 Corinthians 8 ) seems to have an appropriate application to the Christian’s involvement in Halloween activities. As we abide in close fellowship with Jesus, we need never fear being overtaken by evil powers, just as the Corinthians didn’t have to fear the power of the idols to whom the meat had been sacrificed. God has already defeated Satan. But there are other considerations to be observed. The “weak” apparently thought of those who ate the meat as actually worshipping the idols to whom it had been sacrificed. For Paul, it was the concern for the “weak” that was paramount. He thought nothing of eating the meat. Some Corinthian Christians couldn’t eat the sacrificed meat without thinking about the idols. For them it was better not to eat the meat. And if some had difficulty eating the meat with a clear conscience, those for whom the meat caused no problem were to be considerate of those who had difficulty. The bottom line in all of our choices, and particularly when we wish to exercise our Christian liberty, is to be concerned about the spiritual welfare of everyone and to make our choices accordingly. We should especially be concerned about the children and youth who may not have the maturity of adult Christians.
Halloween cannot, by any stretch, be called a Christian holiday. But just as Christians in pagan societies in centuries past found reasons for Christian celebrations at the same time as the pagans were celebrating non-Christian traditions, so the church can have harvest festivals and wholesome autumn activities for its youth and children. Paul’s admonition applies to all our activities, "And whatever you do, whether in word or deed, do it all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God the Father through him" (Col. 3:17).While some Christians are adamantly opposed to allowing children to participate in trick or treat activities, others see nothing wrong with parents accompanying little children to the door of friendly neighbors. In many ways, participation is a matter of conscience since there is no biblical injunction against visiting neighbors for friendly contact. And a Christian witness can be shared with children and parents who come to the believer’s door on Halloween. The Christian response in both instances—opposed to or in favor of “trick or treat” activity—is a matter of personal conscience. Parents who do not want their children to participate in such activity should be able to take their stand without criticism, but neither should they criticize those whose conscience sees the activity as harmless if properly controlled. Likewise, the family that chooses to exercise its liberty of conscience should not find fault with those who choose not to participate. Because “trick or treating” is a matter of personal conscience, the local church should not dictate or sponsor what its members should do as Halloween activity. In all such choices, our relationship with Jesus should have priority and impact our choice on matters of conscience.
As you can no doubt see from the statement made by the church it is technically up to the parents to decide what is right or wrong and to use our judgement in such cases, though the tone is obviously against such activities if only to be on the safe side of the matter.
Our family is one, that I believe, can eat the meat offered to idols and think nothing of it except that we love double-cheese burgers and that we thank God for the food he has provided to us at that moment. We are strong and faithful Christians who walk through the fire each day knowing that Satan, though defeated, still whispers into our ears and begs us to look away from Him who we love so dearly.
Our children, at this point in their lives, believe nothing of the devils, ghosts, and other "creatures" walking the night during trick-or-treat times and as they grow older we will remind them that the activity is one of enjoyment for only the fact that our gracious neighbors have spent their time and money on providing them with a night of fun at the cost of putting on a silly costume that really means nothing. We remind them to pray each night, thank God constantly for all things, and to always ask themselves, "What would Jesus do?".
For fun, I thought I would finish this article by providing a Libertarian prospective to the issue. I guess I would kind of have to considering this is a political blog after all. So enjoy the following article provided by LewRockwell.com and Happy Halloween!
Damien Thompson, writing in the UK’s telegraph, recently noted that "This is the only time of year when I become seriously anti-American." The reason? He hates Halloween.
Apparently, Halloween is one of "America’s worst exports" according to Thompson, and he is at least the second British writer just this year that I’ve noticed going on a tirade against this venerable American holiday.
Now, I don’t fault Thompson (who is one of my favorite religion writers) and his fellow Brits for hating Halloween at all. The dreary streets of London suburbs simply don’t mesh with the spirit of Halloween, and I’m reminded of the one Halloween I spent in Rome where tiny children wandered through the streets (all dressed in identical witch or ghost costumes) and begged shopkeepers and restaurateurs for some kind of treat that I couldn’t identify.
So no, Europeans don’t know a good Halloween any more than they know a decent hot dog, so I don’t begrudge Thompson or his brethren on the continent who also apparently have their own reservations about Halloween.
But what a magnificent American festival it is. The smell of candles burning inside pumpkins, the sound of crunching leaves beneath our feet, and the chance to dress up and beg for free candy are all a recipe for childhood memories that easily rival the fun of even Christmas.
It’s the trick-or-treating that the Brits seem to hate the most, but in America, the act of going door to door to beg for treats is as American as candied apples and pumpkin pie. Indeed, going door to door for treats was once considered the thing to do on numerous holidays. Thanksgiving especially was once considered a day for treat-hunting throughout the neighborhood, as were impromptu and raucous parades of strangely dressed citizens looking for a fun time.
Over time, these door-to-door parades were quashed by the guardians of the respectable middle classes who thought such activities too working-class and too un-bourgeois to be tolerated. Thus, they invented the Thanksgiving turkey dinner and the Thanksgiving football game rituals out of nothing in the late 19th and early 20th centuries in an attempt to replace the more spontaneous celebrations of the common folk.
But Thanksgiving was a cynical creation of government, and Halloween has never been a government-sanctioned holiday, so it is all the more encouraging that trick-or-treating thankfully survives in spite of all the efforts of fear-mongering suburbanites and crazed religious devil-fighters who do their best to ruin the holiday every year.
And what a testament to the inherent goodness of humankind that trick-or-treating survives. Every year, millions of Americans go out and drop quite a bit of money on treats for children, and then give it away for free. And, in all these years of trick-or-treating there are no documented cases of poisonings of children by strangers. Yes, some sick people have poisoned the Halloween candy of their own children, but the risk of being poisoned by some nut in your neighborhood is just about zero.
In spite of what the guardians of decency may have us believe, most people simply aren’t interested in poisoning children. Instead, we Americans take great joy in handing out free stuff to people who ring our doorbells and demand candy.
If foreigners can’t appreciate the sheer fun and exhilaration of such a festival, so be it. I can’t stand it when Americans act like there’s no such thing as a uniquely American culture. Maybe the average American has become too ignorant and classless to know it, but American civilization is simply among the best in both music and in English-language literature. And it’s been that way for well over a century.
And it’s some of that excellent literature that informs what we think of our best secular holiday. The entire mise-en-scène of Halloween comes to us from Americans.
While the idea of the jack-o-lantern may come from an Irish version made from turnips, the modern jack-o-lantern, made from pumpkins, which are native to the Americas, is as American as they come.
And when we think of the elements of Halloween with its dark forests and headless horsemen and gothic freaks and menacing ravens, we are taking a page from the works of writers like Washington Irving and the inimitable Edgar Allen Poe who is the undisputed father of the American horror movie, the ghost story, and the American folklore behind haunted houses and masquerade balls.
Yes, tales of werewolves and monsters, and even Dracula and Frankenstein’s monster come to us from Europeans, but that unique feel of Poe-ish gothic creepiness within a chilly North American autumn is what we all strive to re-create every 31st of October.
What Halloween is complete without a recitation of "The Raven?" And who would let a Halloween go by with out carving a jack-o-lantern? Hopefully few of us would be so thankless as to let such a great American opportunity pass.
What do you think about the Halloween? How does your faith feel about it and do your feelings differ?
Print This Post
Coincident Indexes – How Are Our States Economies Performing?
Have you heard the news lately? You know, the news that everything seems to be turning around, we've hit bottom and are on our way back up, and everything is going to peachy and roses now!
Well, you might want to back up that horse and buggy for just a moment and take a look at this graphic:
Dark Green = economically it has been a good three months
Light Shades of Red = economically it is down but not as bad as it could be
Dark Red = economically its been a very bad three months
Um, is it just me or are there no dark green areas? Secondly, maybe my DNA has a lot of bull in it but am I seeing a lot of red? Yup, I thought so, the numbers just don't seem to add up. We're not doing that well at all, are we?
What do you think? Kinda sad to see Iowa on the same par as California, no?
Print This Post
Wind Power – Tumbleweeds & Cricket Farts
You may recall that awhile back I wrote a blog post about Congressman Braley's Wind Energy Plans. You can find that post by clicking here. I also wrote him a letter letting him know that I disagreed with the government effectively sponsoring these types of projects.
Since then I received a letter in response from Congressman Braley as follows:
Thank you for contacting me regarding government spending on wind energy. This is an important issue and I am glad you have shared your views with me.
I appreciate your concerns regarding the financial burden of government spending, and I know that the current recession has created the need for a significant amount of increased spending. Tough choices have been made in just the last few months, and I believe that we must return to an era of responsible spending and balanced budgets.
As you may know, Iowa ranks second among the states in electricity generated through wind power. Iowa is home to six wind manufacturing companies representing thousands of clean energy jobs and an investment of nearly a quarter of a billion dollars in our state. Iowa now has the installed capacity of over 2,700 MW. This amount of wind generation will provide about 18% of Iowa's total electricity needs.
I have worked hard to restore fiscal discipline to the United States government, and reverse the spending that did occur over the last eight years that sent our nation into debt. Last Congress, the House of Representatives passed a pay-as-you-go (PAYGO) rule, requiring new entitlement spending and new tax cuts to be fully offset. The House steadfastly enforced the PAYGO rule on legislation brought to the floor last Congress, and I have been fully supportive of this process. This process has included more than 30 House bills that required PAYGO offsets of $1 million or more. I am fully committed to the PAYGO principle, and I will work tooth and nail to balance the budget while also helping rejuvenate our nation's struggling economy.
Please know that I will continue working to restore a balanced budget, and I'm committed to getting spending under control as we are able to recover from the current economic recession.
Thanks again for contacting me. I occasionally provide electronic updates on issues I think my constituents might be interested in. If you would like to receive my E-newsletter, please sign up at my website at http://braley.house.gov. On my website you can also view my voting record, and get information about issues important to the First District. If I can be of any further assistance, please don't hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Bruce Braley
Member of Congress
Without actually saying it I think we can all get the feeling that he really just loves the idea of wind power right here in our state. Is it just me or did I actually read that he said, "I have worked hard to restore fiscal discipline to the United States government, and reverse the spending that did occur over the last eight years that sent our nation into debt." Wow, cause in the same letter I believe he said, "Iowa is home to six wind manufacturing companies representing thousands of clean energy jobs and an investment of nearly a quarter of a billion dollars in our state."
Let's pause a moment and think about that. Nearly a quarter billion dollars have been invested in Iowa for wind energy manufacturing companies. Hmm, how about we point out some interesting tidbits and drill into that some more, shall we?
The Wall Street Journal on the 19th of October, 2009 said the following, "Wind-energy producers and equipment makers enjoy state tax breaks." Oh, so were not really collecting any taxes on these investments and were penalizing energy competitors like coal, nuclear, and water based electricity generation companies, right?
How about this, Kansas Wind Alert put out a report detailing some of the massive subsidies that the Federal & State governments are providing to these companies to help them "invest" in our clean air, green, future of win energy. You can find the report here.
Speaking of reports detailing spending, don't overlook this one by John R Sweet. It is worth the read for sure.
Lastly, you can see some of the spending that Iowa itself has reported on its Iowa Office of Energy Independence website. Here are some of the highlights for those crunched for time:
- U.S. Senate proposed to establish a new 30% investment tax credit for facilities engaged in the manufacture of advanced energy property. Estimated cost: $1.647 BILLION over 10 years
- Current law provides $3.5 BILLION of New Market Tax Credits (NMTC) available for last year and this year. However, a new provision will increase the available credits to $5 BILLION per year. Estimated cost: $815 MILLION over 10 years.
I'm sorry, I just cant write anymore on this; I think I'm going to throw up. I haven't even gotten into the actual feasability (or LACK THEREOF) on why this is a terrible idea as it sits today.
Now, I'm not saying I'm against wind energy production by any means. What I am saying is that if this is truly an economical thing to do than business would be doing it on their own. They wouldn't need that tax payers to come in and provide subsidies, tax credits, cash infusions, and God knows what else just to get them started.
Oh, and not to mention that the cost of the electricity we would be provided would cost us MUCH MORE than we pay right now! I'll leave you all with that though. Wanna participate, fill out the comments section below and let me know what you think about all this.
Print This Post
Rural Homes To Be Assessed – Inside & Out
Awhile back I read a news article by the Quad City Times that stated more than 5,500 rural homes in the county were to be assessed both inside and out. This prompted me to wonder what kind of physical access would be required in order to do a really good assessment as indicated in the article.
So, I sent an email to the County Assessor's Office as follows:
Dear Scott County Assessors Team:
I read an article yesterday stating that you will be conducting
assessments on rural properties throughout the Scott County area. I
don't live in any of the mentioned areas but do have a question about
the process. That is: What happens if a homeowner refuses to let you
into their home when performing an assessment? What kind of
repercussions could be expected?
Thank you for your time and consideration of my questions.
I received the following reply less than an hour later (not bad for a government 'eh!):
Iowa law requires homeowners to assist the assessor in listing the
property. This would include measuring the exterior and listing the
interior. If it is not possible to view the interior, then the
appraiser will estimate the listing based on the best information
available from inspection, previous listings, photos, typical
neighborhood standards, etc. Our goal is to value all properties
properly.Dale Denklau
I pondered on that response for a little while and then asked the following:
Dale:
Thank you for the quick response! I'm sorry to be a bother, but could
you give me the code you are referring to when you said, "Iowa law
requires homeowners to assist the assessor in listing the property".
Maybe I need to be more specific in terms of a scenario to help better
explain my question. So, what would happen if the assessor rang the
bell, the homeowner answered, and then said no to allowing the
assessor entry. Would the sheriff be called in?Thanks again and I look forward to your response!
I think this was a fair question and so received the following reply:
Iowa Code Section 441.18 states: " Each assessor shall, with the
assistance of each person assessed---". Code Section 441.19 is titled
"Owner to assist-provisions for assessment". Code Section 441.24 is
titled "Refusal to furnish statement" and states in part "the
assessor---shall proceed to list and assess the property according to
the best information obtainable, and shall add to the taxable valuation
one hundred percent thereof,---". Our goal is not to penalize the
taxpayer, but to value the property correctly. We have very seldom
applied any penalty to any assessment.Our preference is to view the interior as well as the exterior in order
to judge the quality of construction as well as the physical condition.
Refusing entry will not result in involving the sheriff.Dale Denklau
I'm happy to say that our liberties and freedoms, at least in this case, will not be violated by this new action and I applaud the Scott County Assessors Office and Mr. Denklau for their quick and detailed responses.
If you would like more information on this subject or have other questions about real estate property, assessments, and taxes related to such I highly recommend you contact their office in these ways:
Mail:
Scott County
Assessor's Office
Administrative Center
600 W. 4th St.
Davenport, Iowa 52801-1030
Monday - Friday, 8:00 - 4:30
Office: (563) 326-8635
Email:
assessor@scottcountyiowa.com
Print This Post
Property Taxes In Scott County Expected To Rise
You probably already know that properties value here in the Quad Cities haven't changed all that much. There have been some foreclosures but nothing to really write home to Mom. That's the good news; prepare yourself for the bad news.
Property owners, according to Scott County Assessor Dale Denklau and Davenport Assessor Becky Eiting, could face higher property taxes next year because of several factors. When speaking to government officials like Denkalu, Eiting, and others you will hear that the State may change the rollback factor to increase to a higher percentage. Of course, local tax bodies like city governments can offset this change by adjusting lower their tax levies to keep our taxes at about the same level.
Now, what you don't hear is the REASON for the changes and that means we as citizens must dig deeper into the story. Well, considering the State of Iowa, like 45 other States, is facing a budget deficit for the current and next fiscal years. In fact, for the FY2009 Iowa is facing a $134 million deficit that the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities projects say will rise to $779 million for next years budget. Don't worry folks, things may look bad, but we're the government and we're here to help. If you would like more information about Iowa's budget woes you can find a great in-depth story here.
So because we as citizens have been working hard, keeping up our homes values by improving them and keeping them in good repair, and trying to do the right thing it is our State & Local Governments who are going to PUNISH us for our efforts. They have spent themselves silly and mismanaged our tax money and this is the thanks we get for it.
Please join me and write our State representatives and let them know exactly how you feel about the change in the rollback factor, the increase in property taxes, and finally how they've mismanaged our tax dollars and caused this whole mess. You can find the contact information below:
Governor Chet Culver & Lt. Governor Patty Judge
Legislators (find your district's rep and contact them)
If you would like more information on how Iowa Property Taxes work you can find that explanation here.
Print This Post
The RIGHT Way To Indoctrinate Our Children – No really.
There have been so many videos released lately depicting children being indoctrinated by the public school systems to praise Obama. No really, not to praise our country or our God but to literally praise a man who has done nothing but bring delayed ruin to our country.
So, to offset that mood I thought I would take a slice of that pie and bring you what some of our schools are doing with our children. I bring you The Cactus Cuties rendition of the Battle Hymn of the Republic videoed and mixed by The Lubbock Independant School District. The arrangement is by the mother & daughter team of Terri & Cami Caldwell, with Sheena Fadeyi. Enjoy!
Print This Post

