Quad Cities Watchdog Sniffing out government's lack of common sense

23Jan/100

Religion & Politics – How do you view it?

Religion and politics are two of the most important aspects of life that touch everyone no matter what class or accomplishments they may have managed to attain in their lives.

This subject shouldn't be taken lightly and must be looked upon through the eyes of your fellow man so that you may walk in his shoes, if only for a few brief strides that translate into but weeks, so you and I will know and understand those that affect our lives in an ongoing and yet surreptitious fashion.

Evolutionists, Darwinists, and others of a similar notion have yet to see what is so clearly in front of them. They cannot understand that no matter how hard we humans have searched the seemingly infinite universe we cannot find any planet like our own that sustains not just life but complex living beings and plant life of all types.

Those who do not believe in God must surely look to the Sun and ask how it got there and who tells it when and where to rise in the morning. They must ask themselves how oceans stop along our coasts and do not come forth and drown each of us unto our own destiny.

It is easy to say that we came from single celled organisms that somehow and inexplicably came to be from some massive bang that itself is unexplained. It is the exact reason why the word FAITH exists in ALL vocabularies throughout the world because it is much harder to not only have such a thing but to truly live it.

The hard part comes down to understanding the difference between why one would choose to be Jewish, Muslim, Shinto, or any other form of religion that believes there are one or more gods in existence and determine which tale of old is in the right and is the true explanation to who we are and where we come from.

I cannot answer this question for you or even for myself and I doubt that when we walk away from this class we will have the answer. But what I can tell you is that there is a moment in your life when you will come to meet that end where all questions will be answered for you and I. It will be at that moment, when we take our last breath, that we will know if we have chosen the right tale to believe in and whether or not we lived our lives in a way that our Maker will be proud of.

Print This Post Print This Post
31Oct/090

The American Tradition – Halloween

I must admit that I do love Halloween.  Although my church (First Assembly of God) does not believe that we should celebrate or participate in such activities (at least according to my pastor) I cannot subscribe to such.  I, and my family, are independent Christians and do not subscribe to any real specific church and/or all of their customs.  We know that me must obey the 10 commandments, believe that Jesus Christ is our true savior, and that God Almighty was, is, and always will be and those truths are enough for us to be with God for eternity.

I found an article on the First Assembly of God website that speaks specifically to this holiday and I thought I would post it here for those interested in learning what their thoughts are on the subject.  You can find the article in its entirety here.

Halloween causes a greatly magnified problem for Assemblies of God members and adherents. Many of the holiday’s nonreligious symbols and practices are not just neutral, they seem pagan or anti-Christian. On the other hand, certain symbols and activities appear to be neutral, such as pumpkin jack-o’-lanterns, grade school parties, bobbing for apples, and neighborhood "trick or treat," with no tricks whatsoever.

Many symbols and activities, however, hold potential problems for Christian families. Focusing on witches, ghosts of departed persons, evil monsters, devils, and other characters associated with the satanic should never be allowed in Christian social activities, even in innocent play. Young children and even adolescents may, through a light treatment of evil, lose some of their sensitivity to the realities of right and wrong.

Christian parents face a major problem when their young children get caught up in the excitement that friends and playmates express about Halloween parties and wearing bright costumes for a "trick or treat" visit to the homes of trusted neighbors and friends. Circumstances may vary and require different decisions by parents according to the local situation. One or two generations ago, Halloween pranks like soaping windows and overturning sheds seldom turned to breaking windows and destroying property. But in many communities, behavior has changed drastically for the worse. What parents as children once felt to be innocent fun may be something more sinister in today’s society.

There is good reason for exercising extreme caution, even when a parent may feel there is no immediate danger. Involvement in the occult usually begins with something seemingly very innocent and non-threatening. Some game pieces, like the Ouija board, can begin as child’s play but end up as flirtation with demonic powers. A curious reading of horoscopes can move into curiosity about one’s future in a way contrary to Scripture. We are to consult with no one except God about the future, yielding to His silence if He chooses not to answer. A dabbler in the mysterious and unknown can become easy prey to invasion by Satan. Inasmuch as any of these elements are a part of Halloween, the Christian must flee unwholesome curiosity, making God and His Word the source of answers about the spirit world.

Paul’s admonition to the Corinthian Christians about eating meat that had been offered to idols (1 Corinthians 8 ) seems to have an appropriate application to the Christian’s involvement in Halloween activities. As we abide in close fellowship with Jesus, we need never fear being overtaken by evil powers, just as the Corinthians didn’t have to fear the power of the idols to whom the meat had been sacrificed. God has already defeated Satan. But there are other considerations to be observed. The “weak” apparently thought of those who ate the meat as actually worshipping the idols to whom it had been sacrificed. For Paul, it was the concern for the “weak” that was paramount. He thought nothing of eating the meat. Some Corinthian Christians couldn’t eat the sacrificed meat without thinking about the idols. For them it was better not to eat the meat. And if some had difficulty eating the meat with a clear conscience, those for whom the meat caused no problem were to be considerate of those who had difficulty. The bottom line in all of our choices, and particularly when we wish to exercise our Christian liberty, is to be concerned about the spiritual welfare of everyone and to make our choices accordingly. We should especially be concerned about the children and youth who may not have the maturity of adult Christians.




Halloween cannot, by any stretch, be called a Christian holiday. But just as Christians in pagan societies in centuries past found reasons for Christian celebrations at the same time as the pagans were celebrating non-Christian traditions, so the church can have harvest festivals and wholesome autumn activities for its youth and children. Paul’s admonition applies to all our activities, "And whatever you do, whether in word or deed, do it all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God the Father through him" (Col. 3:17).

While some Christians are adamantly opposed to allowing children to participate in trick or treat activities, others see nothing wrong with parents accompanying little children to the door of friendly neighbors. In many ways, participation is a matter of conscience since there is no biblical injunction against visiting neighbors for friendly contact. And a Christian witness can be shared with children and parents who come to the believer’s door on Halloween. The Christian response in both instances—opposed to or in favor of “trick or treat” activity—is a matter of personal conscience. Parents who do not want their children to participate in such activity should be able to take their stand without criticism, but neither should they criticize those whose conscience sees the activity as harmless if properly controlled. Likewise, the family that chooses to exercise its liberty of conscience should not find fault with those who choose not to participate. Because “trick or treating” is a matter of personal conscience, the local church should not dictate or sponsor what its members should do as Halloween activity. In all such choices, our relationship with Jesus should have priority and impact our choice on matters of conscience.

As you can no doubt see from the statement made by the church it is technically up to the parents to decide what is right or wrong and to use our judgement in such cases, though the tone is obviously against such activities if only to be on the safe side of the matter.

Our family is one, that I believe, can eat the meat offered to idols and think nothing of it except that we love double-cheese burgers and that we thank God for the food he has provided to us at that moment.  We are strong and faithful Christians who walk through the fire each day knowing that Satan, though defeated, still whispers into our ears and begs us to look away from Him who we love so dearly.

Our children, at this point in their lives, believe nothing of the devils, ghosts, and other "creatures" walking the night during trick-or-treat times and as they grow older we will remind them that the activity is one of enjoyment for only the fact that our gracious neighbors have spent their time and money on providing them with a night of fun at the cost of putting on a silly costume that really means nothing.  We remind them to pray each night, thank God constantly for all things, and to always ask themselves, "What would Jesus do?".

For fun, I thought I would finish this article by providing a Libertarian prospective to the issue.  I guess I would kind of have to considering this is a political blog after all.  So enjoy the following article provided by LewRockwell.com and Happy Halloween!

Damien Thompson, writing in the UK’s telegraph, recently noted that "This is the only time of year when I become seriously anti-American." The reason? He hates Halloween.

Apparently, Halloween is one of "America’s worst exports" according to Thompson, and he is at least the second British writer just this year that I’ve noticed going on a tirade against this venerable American holiday.

Now, I don’t fault Thompson (who is one of my favorite religion writers) and his fellow Brits for hating Halloween at all. The dreary streets of London suburbs simply don’t mesh with the spirit of Halloween, and I’m reminded of the one Halloween I spent in Rome where tiny children wandered through the streets (all dressed in identical witch or ghost costumes) and begged shopkeepers and restaurateurs for some kind of treat that I couldn’t identify.

So no, Europeans don’t know a good Halloween any more than they know a decent hot dog, so I don’t begrudge Thompson or his brethren on the continent who also apparently have their own reservations about Halloween.

But what a magnificent American festival it is. The smell of candles burning inside pumpkins, the sound of crunching leaves beneath our feet, and the chance to dress up and beg for free candy are all a recipe for childhood memories that easily rival the fun of even Christmas.

It’s the trick-or-treating that the Brits seem to hate the most, but in America, the act of going door to door to beg for treats is as American as candied apples and pumpkin pie. Indeed, going door to door for treats was once considered the thing to do on numerous holidays. Thanksgiving especially was once considered a day for treat-hunting throughout the neighborhood, as were impromptu and raucous parades of strangely dressed citizens looking for a fun time.

Over time, these door-to-door parades were quashed by the guardians of the respectable middle classes who thought such activities too working-class and too un-bourgeois to be tolerated. Thus, they invented the Thanksgiving turkey dinner and the Thanksgiving football game rituals out of nothing in the late 19th and early 20th centuries in an attempt to replace the more spontaneous celebrations of the common folk.

But Thanksgiving was a cynical creation of government, and Halloween has never been a government-sanctioned holiday, so it is all the more encouraging that trick-or-treating thankfully survives in spite of all the efforts of fear-mongering suburbanites and crazed religious devil-fighters who do their best to ruin the holiday every year.

And what a testament to the inherent goodness of humankind that trick-or-treating survives. Every year, millions of Americans go out and drop quite a bit of money on treats for children, and then give it away for free. And, in all these years of trick-or-treating there are no documented cases of poisonings of children by strangers. Yes, some sick people have poisoned the Halloween candy of their own children, but the risk of being poisoned by some nut in your neighborhood is just about zero.

In spite of what the guardians of decency may have us believe, most people simply aren’t interested in poisoning children. Instead, we Americans take great joy in handing out free stuff to people who ring our doorbells and demand candy.

If foreigners can’t appreciate the sheer fun and exhilaration of such a festival, so be it. I can’t stand it when Americans act like there’s no such thing as a uniquely American culture. Maybe the average American has become too ignorant and classless to know it, but American civilization is simply among the best in both music and in English-language literature. And it’s been that way for well over a century.

And it’s some of that excellent literature that informs what we think of our best secular holiday. The entire mise-en-scène of Halloween comes to us from Americans.

While the idea of the jack-o-lantern may come from an Irish version made from turnips, the modern jack-o-lantern, made from pumpkins, which are native to the Americas, is as American as they come.

And when we think of the elements of Halloween with its dark forests and headless horsemen and gothic freaks and menacing ravens, we are taking a page from the works of writers like Washington Irving and the inimitable Edgar Allen Poe who is the undisputed father of the American horror movie, the ghost story, and the American folklore behind haunted houses and masquerade balls.

Yes, tales of werewolves and monsters, and even Dracula and Frankenstein’s monster come to us from Europeans, but that unique feel of Poe-ish gothic creepiness within a chilly North American autumn is what we all strive to re-create every 31st of October.

What Halloween is complete without a recitation of "The Raven?" And who would let a Halloween go by with out carving a jack-o-lantern? Hopefully few of us would be so thankless as to let such a great American opportunity pass.

What do you think about the Halloween?  How does your faith feel about it and do your feelings differ?

Print This Post Print This Post
22Oct/090

Rural Homes To Be Assessed – Inside & Out

Awhile back I read a news article by the Quad City Times that stated more than 5,500 rural homes in the county were to be assessed both inside and out. This prompted me to wonder what kind of physical access would be required in order to do a really good assessment as indicated in the article.

So, I sent an email to the County Assessor's Office as follows:

Dear Scott County Assessors Team:

I read an article yesterday stating that you will be conducting
assessments on rural properties throughout the Scott County area.  I
don't live in any of the mentioned areas but do have a question about
the process.  That is:  What happens if a homeowner refuses to let you
into their home when performing an assessment?  What kind of
repercussions could be expected?

Thank you for your time and consideration of my questions.

I received the following reply less than an hour later (not bad for a government 'eh!):

Iowa law requires homeowners to assist the assessor in listing the
property.  This would include measuring the exterior and listing the
interior.  If it is not possible to view the interior, then the
appraiser will estimate the listing based on the best information
available from inspection, previous listings, photos, typical
neighborhood standards, etc.  Our goal is to value all properties
properly.

Dale Denklau




I pondered on that response for a little while and then asked the following:

Dale:

Thank you for the quick response!  I'm sorry to be a bother, but could
you give me the code you are referring to when you said, "Iowa law
requires homeowners to assist the assessor in listing the property".
Maybe I need to be more specific in terms of a scenario to help better
explain my question.  So, what would happen if the assessor rang the
bell, the homeowner answered, and then said no to allowing the
assessor entry.  Would the sheriff be called in?

Thanks again and I look forward to your response!

I think this was a fair question and so received the following reply:

Iowa Code Section 441.18 states: " Each assessor shall, with the
assistance of each person assessed---".  Code Section 441.19 is titled
"Owner to assist-provisions for assessment". Code Section 441.24 is
titled "Refusal to furnish statement" and states in part "the
assessor---shall proceed to list and assess the property according to
the best information obtainable, and shall add to the taxable valuation
one hundred percent thereof,---".  Our goal is not to penalize the
taxpayer, but to value the property correctly.  We have very seldom
applied any penalty to any assessment.

Our preference is to view the interior as well as the exterior in order
to judge the quality of construction as well as the physical condition.
Refusing entry will not result in involving the sheriff.

Dale Denklau

I'm happy to say that our liberties and freedoms, at least in this case, will not be violated by this new action and I applaud the Scott County Assessors Office and Mr. Denklau for their quick and detailed responses.

If you would like more information on this subject or have other questions about real estate property, assessments, and taxes related to such I highly recommend you contact their office in these ways:

Web: Scott County Assessor

Mail:

Scott County
Assessor's Office
Administrative Center
600 W. 4th St.
Davenport, Iowa 52801-1030

Monday - Friday, 8:00 - 4:30
Office: (563) 326-8635
Email:
assessor@scottcountyiowa.com

Print This Post Print This Post
18Oct/090

Property Taxes In Scott County Expected To Rise

You probably already know that properties value here in the Quad Cities haven't changed all that much. There have been some foreclosures but nothing to really write home to Mom. That's the good news; prepare yourself for the bad news.

Property owners, according to Scott County Assessor Dale Denklau and Davenport Assessor Becky Eiting, could face higher property taxes next year because of several factors. When speaking to government officials like Denkalu, Eiting, and others you will hear that the State may change the rollback factor to increase to a higher percentage. Of course, local tax bodies like city governments can offset this change by adjusting lower their tax levies to keep our taxes at about the same level.




Now, what you don't hear is the REASON for the changes and that means we as citizens must dig deeper into the story. Well, considering the State of Iowa, like 45 other States, is facing a budget deficit for the current and next fiscal years. In fact, for the FY2009 Iowa is facing a $134 million deficit that the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities projects say will rise to $779 million for next years budget. Don't worry folks, things may look bad, but we're the government and we're here to help. If you would like more information about Iowa's budget woes you can find a great in-depth story here.

So because we as citizens have been working hard, keeping up our homes values by improving them and keeping them in good repair, and trying to do the right thing it is our State & Local Governments who are going to PUNISH us for our efforts.  They have spent themselves silly and mismanaged our tax money and this is the thanks we get for it.

Please join me and write our State representatives and let them know exactly how you feel about the change in the rollback factor, the increase in property taxes, and finally how they've mismanaged our tax dollars and caused this whole mess.  You can find the contact information below:

Governor Chet Culver & Lt. Governor Patty Judge

Legislators (find your district's rep and contact them)

If you would like more information on how Iowa Property Taxes work you can find that explanation here.

Print This Post Print This Post
17Oct/090

The RIGHT Way To Indoctrinate Our Children – No really.

There have been so many videos released lately depicting children being indoctrinated by the public school systems to praise Obama.  No really, not to praise our country or our God but to literally praise a man who has done nothing but bring delayed ruin to our country.




So, to offset that mood I thought I would take a slice of that pie and bring you what some of our schools are doing with our children.  I bring you The Cactus Cuties rendition of the Battle Hymn of the Republic videoed and mixed by The Lubbock Independant School District. The arrangement is by the mother & daughter team of Terri & Cami Caldwell, with Sheena Fadeyi.  Enjoy!

Print This Post Print This Post
16Oct/090

Bridge Signs – Worth Taxpayer Money?

In today's Quad City Times Ask The Times section a question was asked about the expense of some unnecessary additions to a local bridge.  The question and response are provided here:

Q: They have just opened the new Blackhawk Creek Bridge in West Davenport. On each of four corners, they have placed a fancy brass sign denoting Blackhawk Creek. These signs are at least 2 1/2 feet in width. They also have two tones, not just the brass. If I had to guess, they probably cost at least $300 each, not including the pillar they are installed upon. Since I have never heard of a tourist coming to Davenport looking specifically for this creek, how can this expense be justified?

- Quad-Citian

A: For starters, the signs cost $1,900 each, or less than 2 percent of the $439,000 rehabilitation cost, City Engineer Gene Hellige said.

He said it has been a tradition in bridge design and construction that a plaque be mounted listing the designer and contractor. Also, the city has long engaged in a program of providing creek name signs at creek crossings.

"When the Clark Street Bridge over Blackhawk Creek was rehabilitated, it was decided to provide plaques to announce the creek name with more distinction than the usual sign and to provide some information on the bridge, which was constructed in 1950," Hellige said.



Wow, so what looks like it might be worth $300 actually cost the Citizens of Davenport nearly $2000!  All so the designer and contractor can have their name displayed (really.. as if anyone truly cares!)?

If they want their name on the bridge, THEY (contractor & designer) should pay for it!  What an outrage when you consider Davenport could have given, for example, the nearly $2000 to the Police Department to use in the OUTRAGEOUS crime they now have there.

If you would like to contact your local representative about this matter you can do so here: http://www.cityofdavenportiowa.com/department/index.asp?fDD=6-0

Print This Post Print This Post
27Sep/090

DeWitt, IA – DeWitt Aquatic Center Pool Leaking Tax Payer Money

Back on June 25th, 2009 The Quad City Times released a story titled "Leak won't close DeWitt pool". The story broke the news that this public city pool was leaking more than 20,000 gallons of water per day due to a possible leak in the water return system according to the DeWitt Parks and Recreation Director Kevin Lake. Lake went on to explain that they were able to maintain the water and chemical levels of the pool and that it wouldn't close until after Labor Day weekend. Labor Day in 2009 falls on September 7th which means the pool will continue to lose 20,000 gallons of water PER DAY for the next 75 days! Simple math would tell us that in those 75 days the pool would have leaked more than 1.5 MILLION gallons of water!

So how much is 1.5 MILLION gallons of water?

  • 12 MILLION bottles of beer or 2.7 MILLION (rounded) six packs of canned beer
  • The average person in the U.S. uses 80 gallons of water per day; so about 18,750 people could be served clean water
  • July 2008 - Population of Dewitt, IA was 5,260.  This means that every person in Dewitt could be served for 3.5 half days worth of water use
  • About what the Mississippi River flows through every second




According to Iowa American Water's rate sheet they charge about $1.205 per 100 cubic feet of water use.  Well, 1.5 MILLION gallons translates to about 200,520.83 cubit feet of water.  So if we run that calculation we could say that the total cost to the city for 1.5 MILLION gallons of water wasted would be about $241,627.60.  Yup, nearly a quarter of a million dollars for 75 days of service on top of all of their other usual costs (note this doesn't include the costs to add chemicals, additional employee time, and if the pool is heated [the city website did not confirm whether or not the pool is indeed heated]).

The DeWitt Observer on August 8th, 2009 reported that two months later the root cause of the leak still had not been found.  Yes, in the article Lake is reported to say that within those previous three weeks no "significant" water loss had been noticed.  The city council decided to close the pool on the 16th of August and only open it up for the weekends of Aug. 22-23, Aug. 29-30 and Labor Day, Sept. 5-7, before closing for the season.  Note that the article didn't indicate that these measures would prevent further leaks or if the leaks had stopped at all.

No further news has been released as of yet in regards to the story.  However, I have put in an email to the city requesting additional information and of which you can be sure I will update this posting as soon as I hear back from them.  What do you think about the situation?  I believe the pool should have been shut down for the season so as not to continue wasting tax payer dollars.  DeWitt, is less than 10 miles away from Scott County Park in which another publicly funded pool is available for use.  Another lack of common sense by our government brought to you by the QC Watchdog.

UPDATE (28SEP09): I received an email from Kevin Lake, Director of Parks & Recreation of DeWitt, today on the status of the pool leak.  Lake stated, "We are still working on locating the leak.  We are in the process of the locating the leak(s) and determining our plan of action."

I will update the post again as more information comes in. Stay tuned!

Print This Post Print This Post
7Aug/090

Davenport, IA – A how-to on fixing rising crime rates…

Davenport, IA is a city adjacent to the one I'm currently living in and as a neighbor (and previous resident) of Davenport I have noticed that crime seems to be an even more pressing issue lately.  In fact, I can't remember a time where I've looked in the morning newspaper and can daily find an article stating that someone has been stabbed or shot.  These crimes seem to generally happen and stem from certain population areas of Davenport that the police just can't seem to get under and keep under control.  So, here is my Libertarian idea of how I would resolve the problems if I were the Mayor and/or Police Chief of Davenport:

The number one way, and most popular way, is to spend more tax money by hiring more police officers to patrol the streets.  However, even though Rudy G. in New York proved this method can work at what tax ramifications are we shoving down the throats of the city's citizens?   I believe I have a better idea; although half-baked I thought I would list it here and see what kind of comments I could drum up from the audiance.

My plan would be to designate swafts of population centers that seem to house those who cause the most issues.  For example, take the area between Locust, Bridge, 14th, & Brady and call it Zone Alpha.  Zone Alpha properties will now be given special tax breaks in order to make them highly appealing to investors.  For example, the average home price in that area is probably around $60,000 and the age of the home is nearing 70-100 years old and in fairly poor condition.  However, these homes were built during a time where bigger was better and hardwood floors, stairs, and other areas were all the rage (as we know these features are in major demand now-a-days as history repeats itself like clockwork) and with excellent square footage and great bones can be turned into beautiful masterpieces.

So lets give investors the tax breaks as follows:

  • Investors who purchase a property within the next 18 months will be given a 100% break on capital gains if they bring the property up to code and refurbish the entire home and lot with 12 months.
  • Investors will be required to sell the property within 24 months from the 12 months refurbishment deadline giving them a total of 3 years from start to finish to fix and sell the property.
  • Investors will not be required to pay property taxes on the property during that 3 year period.  In addition, to help spur sales new homeowners will not be required to pay property taxes for an additional two years from purchase of the property.




I believe this plan could work because investors would automatically make a large % of their flipping profit on the capital gains tax savings and the property tax savings right off the top.  That doesn't even count the spread they will make from the original purchase price and final sales price with appreciation factored in as well.  The city may lose out on some tax revenue initially but in the long run they will make much more because the values of the properties will have massively increased (thus increasing property tax income) and because the purchase price of the properties will be out of the range of previous tenants and incoming hooligans which would immediately reduce crime.

Two major questions come to mind when I present this scenario.  1.) How would you get current homeowners and/or renters to move out? and 2.) Where would these people go?

Well, the first question can be complicated but I think I can tackle it.  Let's say that someone purchased one of the properties in this area two years ago for the average $60,000.   Well, an investor could come in an offer a 5% premium over the current assessed value of the property (maybe more) and convince the owner to move.  Afterall, the neighborhood knows that the prices of the homes will only come down due to the age of the properties and violence in the neighborhood so I could take an educated guess that very few, if any, would pass up such an opportunity.  Afterall, the investor stands to make an automatic profit from the tax savings alone and so has a lot of room to negotiate an acceptable offer.

Secondly, we must answer the question of where would these people go?  Well, once the neighborhood properties have outpriced the previous owners/dwellers they would be forced to rent/buy elsewhere.  Of course some will find local homes in other local neighboorhoods but many will generally move out of the city.  In fact, if this plan takes place all over the city there will be nowhere for these people to reside within the city or surrounding areas.  So then it begs the question of, "What about neighboring cities, won't they have to deal with these people and the crime?".  Honestly, yes they will and with that being said I say, "Who cares."  No really, we resolved the problem here and so when these hooligans move out of our city where do we care where they go, as long as they aren't here to cause us problems it truly is... no longer our problem.  Those cities will have to deal with the issue in their own way.

I'd love to hear comments about my idea and perhaps someone can shoot me down and explain why they believe this wouldn't work.  So fire away!

Print This Post Print This Post